Home – evaluating sources – library guides at uc berkeley

Who’s the writer?
What else has got the author written?
By which communities and contexts will the author have expertise?
- Will the author represent a specific group of world views?
- Will they represent specific gender, sexual, racial, political, social and/or cultural orientations?
- Will they privilege some causes of authority over others?
- Have they got a proper role inside a particular institution (e.g. a professor at Oxford)?

Why was this source produced?
- Is there a fiscal value for that author or writer?
- Could it be an academic resource? Persuasive?
  - What (research) questions will it make an effort to answer?
  - Will it make an effort to be objective?
- Will it fill every other personal, professional, or societal needs?
Who’s the intended audience?
- Will it be for scholars?
- Will it be for an over-all audience?

Home - evaluating sources - library guides at uc berkeley the scope of

Where could it have been printed?
Could it have been printed inside a scholarly publication, just like an journal?
- Who had been the writer? Could it have been a college press?
- Could it have been formally peer-reviewed?
Will the publication possess a particular editorial position?
- May be the publication sponsored by others or organizations? Perform the sponsors have particular biases?
Have there been any apparent barriers to publication?
- Could it have been self-printed?
- Have there been outdoors editors or reviewers?
Where, geographically, could it have been initially printed, as well as in what language?
With what medium?
- Could it have been printed online or perhaps in print? Both?
- Could it be your blog publish? A YouTube video? A TV episode? Articles from the print magazine?
  - Exactly what does the medium let you know about the intended audience?
  - Exactly what does the medium let you know about the objective of the piece?

How’s it highly relevant to your quest?
- Will it evaluate the main sources that you are researching?
- Will it cover the authors or people who you are researching, but different primary texts?
- Can you employ the authors’ frameworks of research for your own research?
What’s the scope of coverage?
- Could it be an over-all overview or perhaps an in-depth analysis?
- Will the scope suit your own information needs?
- It’s time period and geographic region highly relevant to your quest?

Just when was the origin first printed?
What version or edition from the source are you currently talking to?
- Exist variations in editions, for example new introductions or footnotes?
- When the publication is online, just when was it last updated?
What’s altered inside your field of study because the publication date?
What are the printed reviews, responses or rebuttals?

Did they cite their sources?
- Otherwise, have you got every other way to verify the longevity of their claims?
That do they cite?
- May be the author associated with the authors they are citing?
- Would be the reported authors a part of a specific academic movement or way of thinking?
Look carefully in the quotes and paraphrases using their company sources:
- Did they appropriately represent the context of the reported sources?
- Did they ignore any important components using their reported sources?
- Could they be cherry-picking details to aid their very own arguments?
- Did they appropriately cite ideas which were not their very own?

Resourse: http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/